Accountability and updates
Corrections Policy
Oriqeva corrects material factual errors and meaningful outdated information when a reliable source supports the change. We distinguish substantive corrections from routine copyediting so readers can understand when the substance of a page has changed.
What counts as a material correction
A material correction changes information that could affect a reader’s understanding or decision. Examples include an incorrect ingredient or dose, an inaccurate safety statement, a misidentified seller or retailer, a regulatory development, a wrong package or refund term, a source that does not support the cited conclusion, or a significant change in the evidence assessment.
Minor changes
Spelling, punctuation, formatting, layout, accessibility improvements, or wording changes that do not alter the meaning normally do not require a public correction notice. Those edits may still update source files, but we do not use minor cosmetic work as a reason to present an article as substantively refreshed.
How corrections are reviewed
When a concern is received, the relevant statement is checked against the cited source and, where appropriate, a more direct or current source. We consider whether the issue is a factual error, an outdated commercial fact, a source conflict, an interpretation disagreement, or a request that is not supported by evidence. A manufacturer or affiliate request does not automatically override independent evidence.
How corrections appear
Material product updates can be recorded in the page’s change history with a date and short explanation. The page’s modified date may also change when the underlying content changes materially. If an error affected the central conclusion, the correction should be clear enough for a returning reader to understand what changed.
Retractions or major revisions
If a page becomes fundamentally unreliable—for example because the product identity cannot be established or the underlying sources are discovered to be invalid—Oriqeva may substantially revise the page, temporarily remove it from indexing, or retire it. Preserving a ranking is not a reason to keep information online when the publication can no longer support it.
Submit a correction
Email [email protected] with the page URL, the statement you believe is wrong or outdated, and the best supporting source you have. We may not agree with every requested change, but verifiable factual concerns are reviewed against the same source standards used for publication.