Verification before publication
Fact Checking
Oriqeva treats fact checking as a source-matching process. A statement should be supported by a source that can actually answer the question being asked, and uncertainty should remain visible when the source cannot.
Product identity and label checks
Product names, formula details, serving instructions, and disclosed ingredient amounts are checked against current seller, manufacturer, label, or merchant sources when available. We avoid filling missing dosages from another product, an old label, or an unrelated reseller. If the current formula cannot be confirmed, the page describes the uncertainty rather than presenting a guessed formula as current.
Commercial fact checks
Prices, package counts, shipping statements, bonuses, seller identity, and refund terms are time-sensitive. We record dates for commercial verification where practical and avoid presenting an old promotion as a permanent product attribute. If active pages disagree, we may omit the numeric price and tell readers to confirm the checkout instead.
Evidence reference checks
Evidence claims are linked to reference identifiers in the underlying product record. Before a product can pass the publication gate, those references must exist and the evidence wording should not overstate what they support. A paper about an ingredient cannot be cited as if it were a clinical trial of the complete commercial formula unless that is what the paper actually studied.
Safety checks
Safety notes also require linked references. We prioritize authoritative health or regulatory sources for important cautions and use appropriately qualified research when a more specific question requires it. A seller’s failure to mention an interaction is not treated as evidence that no interaction exists.
Dates and freshness
Oriqeva distinguishes a verification date, an update date, and a publication date. A page receives a publication date when it is actually published. An update date should reflect a material content change rather than a routine automated refresh. We do not change dates solely to make a page appear newer in search results.
Conflicting sources
When two sources conflict, the fact checker looks for a more direct or more recent source and considers whether the difference reflects a changed formula, changed promotion, regional variation, or an error. If the conflict cannot be resolved confidently, the page should say that the sources conflict. A clean-looking answer is not more valuable than an honest unresolved one.
Automated quality gates
Oriqeva also uses automated validation to catch structural problems such as missing references, invalid product routes, broken source relationships, missing authorship, missing publication dates for publishable products, and accidental indexing of pages that have not completed review. Automated tests are safeguards, not substitutes for source review.
How to report a concern
Readers who identify a material factual issue can contact [email protected]. Useful reports include the page URL, the statement in question, and a source showing why the statement may be inaccurate or outdated. Material confirmed errors are handled under our Corrections Policy.